If no one knows about what you have come up with, you haven't innovated at all. You need to compel workers to adopt innovations
By
G. Michael Maddock and Raphael Louis Vitón
Question: If there have been skillions upon skillions of new and advanced safety products and services introduced over the past 20 years, why has the rate of industrial accidents remained so stubbornly high?
Answer: People are not using the products and services provided to them.
Innovative safety products work only if they are used. And if people don't understand clearly the benefits of your innovation, they are not going to use it, no matter how great it is.
The safety industry serves as a wonderful case in point. Failure to use protective gear provided at the workplace accounts for 40% of work accidents, according to the National Safety Council. Despite continuing workplace safety efforts, this statistic has been consistent for 20 years.
So where's the disconnect? Why aren't the safety innovations making more people safer? Indeed, why aren't people rushing to use your new innovative product or service despite its inherent superiority?
The answer can be found within our definition of innovation. As you'll remember, we believe that innovation occurs when:
1) There is a significant need or insight.
2) A product, service, or business model meets that need.
3) There is clear communication that connects No. 1 to No. 2.
We'll give the safety industry the benefit of the doubt that it's addressing the right needs with the right products. What's missing is the communication that connects the two.
Unlike the insurance industry, which communicates—albeit inadequately—the benefits of its products, the safety industry doesn't communicate those virtues in a believable or meaningful way at all.
The problem with that is obvious, no matter what you do for a living. You simply cannot assume your innovation's benefits are apparent to everyone, let alone believable.
The lack of response to the safety products raises at least one logical question: Why the irrational resistance to new things that will make our lives better (in this case, make us safer)? Research shows that our psyches have actually been wired to overestimate the possibility of good things happening to us ("We'll win the lottery") and underestimate the likelihood of bad things happening ("Seat belts—too much of a pain").
So why aren't people in high-risk professions, such as firefighters and police officers, buying and using the new products out there? There are three simple explanations:
1) They are not aware of the new safety regulations and standards.
2) Even if they are aware of them, they don't understand the safety regulations and standards or believe they apply to them.
3) They don't know the new products and services exist, don't believe they need them, aren't willing to pay the price for them, don't believe they'll work, and don't want to change their own behavior even if it's in their best interest.
In other words, compelling communication is lacking. What's the best way to communicate the innovation you have developed? Understanding the emotional and psychological tendencies of your audience will shape how you go about it. Think of your audience in terms of three groups:
1) Open ("Give me the information"): A small minority of people are actually receptive to change. They will require information and education, so make it readily available, accessible, understandable, and sharable.
2) Entrenched (It'll take an intervention): A larger group will be entrenched in em>not changing; they will require an enforceable law, mandate, and penalty to drive change. You need to show them the problems they will face if they don't take advantage of what you are offering.
3) Stubborn but not self-centered: The majority of people you are courting will not pull the trigger until social influence and social marketing are applied to get them to want to change for someone other than themselves ("My family and friends want me to change").
The thing to keep in mind in all three scenarios is this: The gap between knowing and doing is far greater than the gap between ignorance and knowledge.
This article originally published in BusinessWeek
Have you seen the new Maddock Douglas homepage?
Follow Maddock Douglas on Twitter